same thing with bill clinton. he had all of those tapes as president trump outlined in his speech tonight. was his home rated? no. the department of justice defended bill clinton in front of a federal judge and said he had it right under the presidential records act to have those documents including classified material. trump's defense is going to be they will file several motions, challenging the indictment. they will argue that the governing law is the presidential records act which supplants a general statute such as the espionage act. >> last word, matt whitaker. we only have a second. >> yeah, well this case is obviously a long way from the end. i will just point out what greg said is so important. the case law is very much on president trump's side. >> i appreciate all three of you being with us. matt, greg and alan. here with moderna is joe tacopina own. we are talking a lot about unequal justice and the law and lack of equal justice and equal application. if these cases are not related. they are related in

's like president clinton -- i president clinton's -- like president clinton' case -- the best record he can make is that they are my personal recollections of them and then they are mine. what are the notes about? you might argue it was a purely personal note. i love melania.

and of course, you have the hillary clinton example. you know, hillary clinton was never investigated obstruction, shawn. it's not even that they didn't even investigator they didn't investigated for perjury. and there was plenty of false statements that even investigated for that. and the evidence is beyond anything that we've ever seen with a former of state. she wasn't even a former president. the presidential records act doesn't even apply to her. and so the espionage act, i would argue, doesn't apply to any former president or any former vice president under the presidential act. why? it's called the presidential records act. people come on the tv and they say, well, he needs to have the law applied to him, as would anybody know. it's called the presidential records act because he is the executive branch. he's the executive branch. so he doesn't have to rely on some subordinate here. the regulation. >> and this is the way you do it, mr. president. his power comes from the constitution. he is a third branch of government. him he alo

but they included in the clinton discussions and the clinton tapes, a discussion of u.s. military involvement in haiti. he can't get away from haiti. he's done very well with haiti. discussions of u.s. foreign policy, both defense and offense against cuba. and what about them allowing china to have military bases now in cuba? i think you're not too happy about that, mr. senator. he's not even saying anything about it. recording and president clinton's conversations with foreign leaders. sensitive facts about trade negotiations taken from presidential briefings. this is all the tapes. discussions with the secretary state about conflict in bosnia and much much more. not only was bill clinton never even considered for criminal

on this family, too, there is nowhere to put klima about the infamous list of clintons. we have repeatedly told the white hillary in general, the founders of the clan one was president for two terms. prior to that, five more governor spouses. senators, the secretary of state also really wanted to take the white house, but she lost to trump, high positions and here, next to selfish interests, the most infamous prime minister is the controversy around white water, during which the then governor and first lady of arkansas bill and hillary clinton invested in whitewater real estate, a real estate development corporation, which at the time was owned by two of their closest associates, james clinton and susan mcdown whitewater. ultimately they broke. after the clintons poured tens of thousands of dollars into it in an attempt to pay off the mcdools, banker david hale eventually. he testified under oath that bill clinton tried to force him to give the court in the amount of 300,000 dollars. as a bribe susan mcdowell, although mcdowell was ultimately charged with various crimes,

jordan, reference the clinton plan intelligence. exactly what was the clinton plan? >> based on declassified documents, in the public, record there was intelligence information that was received, adversely the same time that the information came from the australians. within a day or two. that intelligence, included information that there was a purported plan, designed by one of mrs. clinton's former policy advisers, to create less candle tying donald trump to the russians. that is the essence of the intelligence, as contained in the de-classified information. >> did the president receive this intelligence? >> on august 3rd, of 2016, then director prime and had briefed the president, vice presidents director of national intelligence, the fbi attorney general and others. >> when you say at the, you made mr. comey? >> on august 3rd it was conducted at the white house, the director comey himself. >> so mr. comey knew about this, president obama knew about this, vice president biden knew about this. but it was not provided to the agents on the case, or provided with the s

then the former president and then candidate hillary clinton were treated differently. nothing has changed within the f.b.i. despite all its recent reforms. finally, any american out there could be victimized by this agency. democrats including adam schiff are expected to point to the fact that durham's only been able to indict three people with only one conviction. he is not expected to give very long answers and we may not hear an opening statement from him. this is expected to go into the afternoon as members have about five minutes of questioning each. we have over 40 members here. it will be an interesting hearing, guys. >> dana: thank you for setting us up on that and we'll get back to you if anything else breaks. >> bill: as we wait for this to begin let's bring in john ratcliffe. former director of national intelligence. a couple basic questions. what do we learn today from this witness? >> when i became dni, i met with him and we reviewed the intelligence i had from the i.c. and intelligence he was finding from the department of justice and f.b.i. and asked him

sucks case. -- clinton socks case. leaving the white house, bill clinton kept 79 audiotapes in his sock drawer. they included discussions of u.s. military involvement in haiti, discussions of u.s. foreign policy both defensive and offense of against cuba, recordings of president clinton's conversations with all of the many foreign leaders at the time. think of that. sensitive facts about trade negotiations taken from presidential briefings, discussions with the secretary of state around conflict in bosnia and much much more. very big stuff. not only was bill clinton never even considered for criminal prosecution based on the tapes he took, but when he was sued for them, he won the case. judge amy berman jackson's decision states under the statutory scheme established by the presidential records act the decision to segregate personal materials from residential records is made by the president during the president's term. and in the president's soul discretion -- sole discretion. you are surprised to hear that aren't you

factor in hillary clinton. she sent and received classified email on her private email server for all the talk about trump being reckless, storing documents, near a bathroom, in a bathroom, clinton did the exact same thing. her private email server was in a bathroom closet at the colorado apartment of the you i.t. firm she contracted. trump is also excused of obstructing justice, something clinton is too familiar with. while the use of her private server was under investigation, an aide, justin cooper, destroyed several of clinton's old cellphones with a hammer by, quote, breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer, closed quote. brian pagliano got subpoenaed. he ignored the subpoena. is he in jail? i don't think so. remind me to check rikers. of course you'll remember when clinton was indicted, forced to turn herself in to the federal courthouse for her actions. let's take a look at the footage. oh, wait a second. we don't have it because it never happened. unlike donald trump, clinton was never charge

the clinton dominated decade? the seinfeld decade, the clueless decade, the best decade ever, or something else? maybe the dramatic. what do you think, folks? go ahead, natasha. i'm going to kind of personify the nineties a little bit and i would like to call it the teenage decade for decade, yes. and i think this is because it has the lot of a lot of characteristics of being a teenager. so you can have that kind of decade. yes. i am personifying the decade as the teenage decade. there is that cluelessness, maybe the potential to look back with nostalgia, but also a lot of reckless decisions. you can see a lot of that in clinton, certainly with spectacle. i would say fits with drama. and i think also it's important to remember that with the internet, there was a lot of opportunity for growth and a lot of things started in the nineties that would become very important later on, which is something that you would do as a person if you were growing. i think it's a jumping off point for a lot of things that also has a

i want to go back to the clinton socket case. have you studied the opinion issued by a justice amy jackson she said a president is entitled to these documents if he determines that theyy are personal and she said in her decision that it doesn't matter if they are classified if he calls them personal he's allowed to take them and should this case, should the espionage act even have been used to proceed for the president and vice president less you have a case where you can prove he gave this stuff to china. thank you. >> guest: i am not sure it is a correct reading of the case but certainly we can discuss the right approach to it. at the end of the day, the question about whether something is a presidential record versus a personal record is a statutory question. there's a definition in the statute and the president can make an assertion but the decision ultimately is made by the courts in litigation like this like the clinton socket case and like this litigation going forward against the president. now, certainly the president's

hillary clinton broke the law and did not get indicted.en broke the law and in many other ways we are finding out and so far, has not gotten indicted. i did everything right, and they indicted me, but we are serving as a great example. in the case of bill clinton's national security advisor, remember that? sandy berger was caught stealing classified documents from the national archives, very big ones, very important ones, by stuffing them in his pants. that's pretty. putting them also in his socks and he destroyed them and cut the tape with scissors, cut them all up. what berger did was highly illegal, but he was given nothing, no jail time, nothing, nothing happened. there are countless other examples. bill clinton, who i happen to like. hard to believe, right? before i did this, i was white -- quite friendly with him. nice guy. they should have used him a little bit more as an advisor on the 2016 election. he said you better get to wisconsin and michigan, you are going to lose. no, were not. they did. clinton lost the nuclear codes and a

. >> was a germ reported attempts to make a case that the clinton investigations of clinton were given more favorable treatment to that of president trump, but you leave out one very notable example. but if you make no discussion of the fact the e-mail investigation of hillary clinton was made very public form before the election was it not? james comey discuss drink hillary clinton's e-mails in the days leading up to the election for. >> if i follow your question i do not think the report says mrs. clinton was given more favorable treatment. i think what the report says is the fbi to exercise some considerable discipline and how it was going to approach those matters of how the fbi people involved in crossfire hurricane -- not crossfire hurricane. an odd request why would you leave outut wearing contrast between fbi public discussion right before the election and keeping confidential the trump investigation. wasn't that a glaring disparity in how they were? >> i do not know. >> you don't know? what's the fbi data mr. call me did what they did. didn't they did and clearly contrast the

bill clinton was abusive to women. hillary clinton attacked those same women., hillary clinton is left in this weird position of, "how do i explain this?" her aides are essentially advising her to play it cool. that is hard for her, but she does it effectively. [hillary] when i hear something like that, i am reminded of what my friend, michelle obama, advised us all. when they go low, you go high. it was baked in that donald trump was a reality star who had three wives, who did all kinds of things that ended up in the tabloids. they knew that. the fact that he took that to the next level, we were all shocked that he did that in the moment. but in retrospect, i don't know why we were shocked. back in the 1970s, i worked for the children's defense fund and i was taking on discrimination against african-american kids in schools. he was getting sued by the justice department for racial discrimination in his apartment buildings. clinton was tougher in the debates than trump's opponents in the republican side. and she won those three debates by conventional measure,

cover up clinton's crimes. we know this to be a fact. 33,000 emails miraculously disappeared. phones were smashed with hammers by the fbi. even cnn fact checked this and it turned out to be true. yes, cnn. they refused to prosecute. this selective prosecution isn't only favor of the contents we have seen in very recent history -- all of a sudden -- hunter biden will likely serve no jail time, and yet there was no early morning spot right on hunter's home in coordination with the media either. the american people are second out of this tiered justice system, and as a black man i am tired of seeing this kind discretion used to favor people like hunter biden because he is white and the son of a president. while hunter biden will serve no jail time for these charges, blackmon across this country are in prison for years for the exact same crimes. and i am not surprised. i guess justice shouldn't come as a surprise -- -- joe biden was one of the officers of the 94 crime bill. one of my all-time favorites. we could se

the foundation or whatever. -- the clinton foundation or whatever. hillary saw vast quantities of classified and sensitive

jordan, reference the clinton plan intelligence. exactly what was the clinton plan? >> based on declassified documents, in the public, record there was intelligence information that was received, adversely the same time that the information came from the australians. within a day or two. that intelligence, included information that there was a purported plan, designed by one of mrs. clinton's former policy advisers, to create less candle tying donald trump to the russians. that is the essence of the intelligence, as contained in the de-classified information. >> did the president receive this intelligence? >> on august 3rd, of 2016, then director prime and had briefed the president, vice presidents director of national intelligence, the fbi attorney general and others. >> when you say at the, you made mr. comey? >> on august 3rd it was conducted at the white house, the director comey himself. >> so mr. comey knew about this, president obama knew about this, vice president biden knew about this. but it was not provided to the agents on the case, or provided with the s

jordan reference a clinton plan what exactly was a clinton plan?on declassified documents and public record there is intelligence information that was received at virtually the same time that the information came from the australians. within a day or two. that intelligence included information there was a purported plan designed by one of mrs. clinton's policy advisors to create a scandal tying donald trump to the russians that is the essence of the intelligence as obtained in the declassified information. >> of the presidents receive this. intelligence? >> on august 3, 2016 then director brennan brief to the president and vice president, the director of national intelligence, theof fbi, the. >> we say fbi deeming mr. comey? >> on august 3 it was directed at the white house and call me himself. >> soap call lately about this great president obama knew about this. vice president biden knew about this. but it was not provided to the agents on the case or to the secret visor court is that correct? >> is correct. >> why wasn't it? >> we can tell you wh

for starters, trump's repeated reference to the so-called clinton socks case, which involves bill clinton'sersonal records of interviews between him and a biographer, which at one point were kept in a sock drawer, is a desperate attempt to twist the presidential records act. those tapes were clinton's personal property and he had every right to have them in his possession. unlike the sensitive government material that trump took from the white house, including national security or classified material. as for hillary clinton and joe biden, the crucial difference between their handling of classified material and donald trump is his lack of cooperation. according to the indictment, trump allegedly a deceived authorities about the documents in his possession. that's what sets his case apart. both clinton and biden actually worked with investigators. so, here's a comparison that might be more useful for trump. retired air force officer robert bircham who, like the former president was accused in florida of mishandling classified documents and charged with violating at the very same law that the

hillary clinton had some documents that had classified markings. donald trump had over 100 documents that went to our most core national security issues. second of all, there's just the willful disobedience and obstruction by donald trump. the fact that he lied. this is the second half of the indictment, that he lied to his lawyers to get them to lie to doj and the grand jury. so i don't necessarily agree that what hillary clinton did could not have been charged by any reasonable prosecutor but i certainly believe that what trump did was worse. - do you think for the layman who is just hearing the basics of each of these cases- - yeah. - it is easily confusable? - i do. i do understand the argument. i don't agree but i understand the argument that these cases are all somewhat similar and they are, they're similar but they're not the same. - yeah. - all these cases, trump, hillary clinton, bidenpence, they all involve classified documents. they're all similar in that respect but again, they're not the same and the prosutor's job is to drill into the

hillary clinton should be held -- you think hillary clinton should be held to a higher standard, so you must also agree, therefore, that donald trump should be held to that same high standard. >> but that is not the standard because under hillary clinton, she was let go, she was not indicted, she had classified documents on her server, they tried to obstruct it and she was able to walk away. if that is the standard, then you have mike pence with classified documents in his home and joe biden had classified documents spread across the country, different boxes including unsecured in his garage, if trump is going to be indicted so too should be joe biden. i also can't get beyond the fact that every time we find corruption and evidence of corruption on joe biden, donald trump gets indicted, i mean, that is what i see just as in everyday american, as someone who has not seen eye to eye with donald trump, and that is how we operate? i don't think it is the right way and i think it is shameful what is happening today. >> norah: congresswoman, i understand you represent the first district of so

so and in walks the clintons with all their baggage, the clinton foundatione, the c,h you know, was kind of a slush fund for them to make a lot of money speeches before goldmaesnb sachs and all these other places where they were essentially where they were going to be regulategulated by she was elected president. alprl this horrible stuff for years, even when they were in the white house, whitewatehousey before that, if you remember whitewater, they she comes out with a hat. >> she's hawking a hat. now, the hat proceedsthe ha apparentlyt are going to go to some voting rights thing, but it seems like a virtuecove signaling cover up to make some money. >> yeah, it's justr-o make totat aware that. the fact is, when we bring up hillary clinton, it's not not t. rac >> that's what the law is. the law is about precedent. and also we put in perspective, ist that and also we go andt also think about what is one of the biggest holes in this whole caseis compence,. that. i mean, i'm sureig the indictments compelling and there's evidence and stuff like that.so one of the big holes, though, brian, is

people in the clinton case took a hammer to a blackberry and destroyed it. >> you had secretary clintonlassified material on a server. she was not president of the united states, she was secretary clinton. you have that happen. nothing happens to her. >> you know the facts. what are the facts? >> dana, as you know, cases come down to facts and evidence, not politics. and these two cases could not be more different on the facts. so let's talk about what we actually found in the hillary clinton email case. yes, hillary clinton maintained private servers. emails went across the servers. ultimately she returned 30,000 emails to the department of defense, work-related emails. in addition we found thousands more emails that she exchanged with people. the total classified materials seized from that review were essentially 55 email conversations, strings of emails, in which eight were classified top secret, 37 secret, and 10 confidential. it's important to remember those weren't classified documents. that was simply the content of email exchanges that was later deemed to be classified. these we

clinton's server. of the state department. if anything, was it state or justice? >> justice. i'm sorry, even better. if anything, there was quote evidence of a conscious effort to avoid sending classified information by writing around the most sensitive material. horowitz concluded. so what the inspector general of the justice department said after the obama justice department decided not to prosecute, and the trump justice department decided not to prosecute is that unlike donald trump, who threw stuff in toilets, nuclear secrets here, bathrooms, in ballrooms, right by where they're playing poker and everything else, they said, unlike that, hillary clinton went out of her way not to discuss any classified information on the e-mails. >> but none of that matters to a certain group of people. it's mad libs. it's bleached server, hillary, chappaqua, all the words you hear. >> and the truth will win out eventually. >> it will. and how many times have we heard in the last few years that republicans privatel

the same jim comey did not go after hillary clinton. in fact, he created a new standard called the reasonable prosecutor standard. he said even though there is evidence of wrongdoing under the law with hillary clinton with 33,000 e-mails, a reasonable prosecutor would not pursue this. under jim comey standards, a reasonable prosecutor would have to prove donald trump violated the law and this should be brought because it was so egregious that it is worth indicting a presidential candidate, perhaps a nominee of the republican party that meets the high standard. we haven't seen the indictment, but that's a very high standard, sean. >> yeah. let's get your take, tammy. >> i will never forget the few days after the midterms last year, joe biden at a live press conference statement asked about the fact that trump had made some hint that he might run again. joe biden stated that he would make sure that donald trump would not take power. he said specifically, we just have to demonstrate that he will not take power. if he does run, making sure

clinton is one of the first guests in cairo. he can build egypt with the help of america and move forward. morsi, who studied in america for many years , is optimistic about america and its embassy in egypt. hillary clinton for support america is coming from the revolution and i thank the presidency, there is a warm atmosphere between hillary clinton and morsi, but on the other hand, the american embassy is shaping a new story in egypt, that the military and security forces have come to this embassy a lot these days. but no one is aware of these developments and it seems that the good days of men continue and the past is repeated. the star of iqbal musa will be black with these shouts and fires. the doctor who was supposed to turn this question into the economic power of africa has broken under the pressure and america's values ​​have not been realized and morsi humiliates his critics he calls them illiterate, ignorant and identityless. now people are coming to the streets again. egyptian military forces are still under the supp

trump wanted to get into her head. >> bill clinton was abusive to women. >> hillary clinton was leftd position of how do i explain this. >> he was being advised to play it cool. >> when i hear something like that i am reminded of what my friend, michelle obama, advised us all. when they go low, hugo high. >> trump was considered a reality star and did all kinds of things to end up in the tabloids. the fact that he took that to the next level, we were shocked. in retrospect though i don't know why we were shot. >> i worked for the children's defense fund and i was taking on discrimination against african-american kids. and he was getting sued by the justice department for racial discrimination in his apartment buildings. >> he was tougher in the debates and he won those three debates by conventional measure, easily. >> the nastiest presidential campaign in our lifetime has come to a head. four out of five said they were disgusted by it. >> people were very excited. >> if pennsylvania goes as it has, it is looking increasingly likely that she is on her way. >> the hillary campaign, the

's like president clinton -- i president clinton's -- like president clinton' case -- the best record he can make is that they are my personal recollections of them and then they are mine. what are the notes about? you might argue it was a purely personal note. i love melania. that note is a personal record but the problem is it is on a >> and we're going to leave this here to keep our over 40-year commitment of live gavel-to-gavel coverage of congress. more member speeches. later today we expect lawmakers to consider a bill funding to build or renovate seven veterans' medical facilities as well as a program providing entrepreneurship training to veterans. live coverage on c-span. the speaker pro tempore: the house will be in order. the prayer will be offered by chaplain barry c. black from the u.s. senate. the chaplain: let us pray. eternal god who alone spreads out the heavens and rules the raging of the sea. on the very day we celebrated the freedoms you have intended for each person, a day when, by the pen stroke of one person in texas, juneteenth became the symbol of the last ves

a lot of my conservative friends keep bringing up hillary clinton, etc., etc. trump was in office for four years. i would imagine, back in 2016 the chant when i voted for him was lock her up. i imagine he did whatever he could in his -- and his doj looked into it. why bringing that up now, how is that helpful at all? it seems these are like apples and oranges. to the previous segment, trans rights are human rights and putin is not in control. guest: thanks for your question. a lot of it is just a flexion. -- deflection. if you do not have the law on your side, argue the facts. if you have -- if you do not have either, make a lot of noise. this is designed to distract from the issue at hand, which is he took documents from the white house that belonged to the american people. that, when the national archives tried to get them back, he stonewalled them and the only remedy left to the national archives to get those documents back was to go to the doj. the doj made the decision to prosecute, or to take it to a grand jury. a grand jury of president jumps

nothing like that was in hillary clinton's 30,000 emails. it is up to republicans to explain this to republicans that this is not apples and apples. there are fundamental material differences between the content of these email cases, not the least of which joe biden admitted that he found them on accident. he didn't spend 18 months moving them around the country evading justice. this is not the media's fault. we're telling it right now. you guys are telling it right now. we're trying to unpack it for the audience. there are fundamental differences. and the leadership of the republican party -- people like chris sununu, who by the way, represents the more sane wing of the republican party right now, it is on people like him and chris christie and larry hogan and charlie baker, the folks who have stood up to the extreme party, blue state republicans, that can speak broadly to independents and to a broad swath of americans to explain what is going on. >> i was crawling out of my skin during that entire interview because chris sununu is, as marg

you talk about hillary clinton, hillary clinton case so obvious. not even a president or a vice president. the presidential records act does not apply to her. if you are apply anything st is espionage act and that does not apply, but okay, fine. they didn't investigate her for obstruction. even though they destroyed her past cell phones with hammers, have you tried that. so they never investigated her, or obstruction or perjury even though there were existi exist. >> she gets away scot-free. no s.w.a.t. team, why? bill clinton and the socks case for years he is recording and top-secret international stock keep it for a book to write. and his legacy and that, keeps in his socks draw, leaving presidency, take its with him. take its all with him. nobody charged him with violating espionage actor thought about it. so what happened? judicial watch walks in said under foia freedom of information act to national archives, get those tapes, goes in front of a judge, away liftist, she went after stone. and what does he rule? i can't do anything. my hands are

nothing like that was in hillary clinton's 30,000 emails. it is up to republicans to explain this to republicans that this is not apples and apples. there are fundamental material differences between the content of these email cases, not the least of which joe biden admitted that he found them on accident. he didn't spend 18 months moving them around the country evading justice. this is not the media's fault. we're telling it right now. you guys are telling it right now. we're trying to unpack it for the audience. there are fundamental differences. and the leadership of the republican party -- people like chris sununu, who by the way, represents the more sane wing of the republican party right now, it is on people like him and chris christie and larry hogan and charlie baker, the folks who have stood up to the extreme party, blue state republicans, that can speak broadly to independents and to a broad swath of americans to explain what is going on. >> i was crawling out of my skin during that entire interview because chris sununu is, as marg

derogatory information clinton provided. they met and as i believe in a report, the report laid that out that the discussion then at trump towers was about adoption, not about anything relating to mrs. clinton. >> it is totally about sanctions, trying to get rid of a law. adoptions is a ruse. should you not have looked into that and seen what the russians were wanting in return for that? the biggest thing putin wanted to trump to relieve his people of sanctions. >> i think that director mueller investigated that and one of your house committees explored that. that was outside the scope of what we were looking at. >> it was outside the scope of your authority to look at p manafort meeting to exchange polling data. >> i'm not following you. >> you remember manafort the crook that managed the campaign for nothing but got money from different russian people over the years that you pardoned and mr. barr pardoned? manafort. >> i know who he is. >> he met with someone and discussed polling data. >> i know that the man met with a lo

the fact that what happened to hillary clinton, bill clinton, joe biden. nothing compared to what's happening to donald trump. >> you know kevin, special counsel, jack smith, give a televised statement today. he said three things i think we can all agree on. he said, trump is innocent until proven guilty, the american people deserve for trump to have a speedy trial, and he said, the american people if they want to know more about the charges, they should read the indictment. if you look at the indictment and one thing, look at page 16 of the indictment. it is pretty stunning! talks about a recorded conversation, where president trump showed to a writer and another journalist, a classified document about war plans us military had planned. and he says, his nose is secret, and is a classified. he said he could have declassified but did not. basically, took away all of his defenses. he can't say he didn't know was classified, he can't say declassified it previously. he doesn't really have a defense if you look at that page 16 and encourage all of your views to

and attack on bill clinton.have not heard is the behavior that you want to see in a president of the united states. >> i am just justifying his behavior. if it is up to me, nobody wou endorse documents? >> you are saying for him to be president of the united states. >> what's happening is delegitimatizing him. the game has changed, bill clinton's under 2023 standard would be persecuted for perjury. we have changed the game. you impeached him after he was out of office and now charges of manhattan that's ridiculous. you are accusing the guy of being a spy through espionage. it is not going to change my support for donald trump. he's innocent until proven guilty. what i am trying to convey to you and i am sorry i am not doing a better job that most republicans believe that the law now is a political tool that hunter biden's laptop story was, that the people in charge that had their thumb on the scale. the reason it was not known to be true, october of 2024 of the election is the intelligence community wants you to

>> in the hillary clinton case under the jack smith standard and hillary clinton should have been charged on many counts of violating the statute and this is the problem is the equal justice under the law. that concept is out the window because that was a fleeting moment where the fbi director can stand up and give someone a pass that now we have the biden administration, through their special counsel and jack smith who directly reports to garland is targeting the main political opponent.he stood up today and said essentially he was representing the intelligence community. guess of the intelligence community when after and 2015 and 2016? donald trump. and here we go again. >> by the way to some shocking news last night. the conspiracy theorists of all theorists rachel maddow said something true on her show. take a pause and note. >> you have to wonder if the justice department is considering if there is some political solution to this criminal problem, if part of the issue here is not just that trump has committed crimes but he has committed crimes and plans to be back in the white house.

no collusion after two and a half years that was set up by hillary clinton and democrat . but this is what they do.s this is what they dowhaty do so. if they would devote their energies to honesty and integrity, they would be a lot better for our country. they could do a lot better. they could do a lo.t of great oa things. now, on true social, he also wrote, quote, the corrupt bidenn administration has informed my attorneys that i have been indicted has inf seemingly over the boxes hoax. even though joe biden has 850 boxes at the university of delaware additional boxes ines i chinatown in d.c., more boxes a at the eupen biden center and documents strewn all overr r his garage floor where he parks's corvetteette which is secured by only a garage door that is paper thin and open. >> much ofn the he continues quote i have been summoned to appea i havr at the federalsi courthouse in miami on tuesday at 3 p.m.. i never thought it possible that such a thing could happenfr to a former president of the united states who received i far more many votes than any sitting president in